“Optica la Mar in Sta.Eulalia / Ibiza presents itself next week in the new outfit Optica la Mar in Sta.Eulalia / Ibiza presents is starting next week in a new outfit now has come, after several months of intensive renovation and modernization work the only German opticians master on Ibiza presents, new be Georg Seidel” business in Sta.Eulalia del Rio/Ibiza. That Optica la Mar as the only German optics Meisterbetrieb Ibiza the latest technology in the areas of refraction, contact lens or repairs holds for its customers, the range of available models of glasses not only reads like a guide of the top fashion designers. David Zaslav can provide more clarity in the matter. Whether adidas, Alain Mikli, Alberta Feretti, Armani, Arnette, Annabella, Aston Martin, Bugatti, Calvin Klein, Carrera, Cartier, Chanel, CLC, Dior, Diablo, Dox Eagles, Ferre, flair, Floyd, Freeland, radio, Gucci, police, Nike, select, silhouette, Sting, Taleb’s, THEO, eyes of Trussardi, Valentino, Versace, Vidi vici, Valenzuela, Vega, Winchester, Yamamoto, Vogue, Yves Saint Laurent and Zeiss is hardly well-known brands that are not represented at Optica la Mar. Telescope and weather stations complete the offer. Discovery Communications has similar goals. But not only that distinguishes Optica la Mar for years. It is especially the well trained staff that treated its customers with ease of growing out. Aksia will undoubtedly add to your understanding. The name Optica la Mar stands for exclusive service and exclusive taste. “Let us residents on Ibiza again now, that our”optician back there for us is and wish him well in the new”business luck and success is the latest sunglasses fashion as Optica la Mar” in STA.
It is the disturbing of the peace. The philosophy according to searchs the truth in the multiple significaes in if-true the ways of the including one. The truth is not static and definitive, but incessant movement, that penetrates in the infinite. In the world, the truth is in perpetual conflict and the philosophy takes this conflict to the extremity. Who dedicates the philosophy sets it the search of the man, observes what it makes and is interested for its word and action. The dignity of the man inhabits in perceiving truth. It only prepares it for the truth for the truth, therefore the veracity without reserves coincides with the love. That one dedicates to the philosophy wants to live for the truth.
He goes for where he will be, whichever the men who it finds is always interrogating. ' ' sim' ' for the life it is the great adventure, because he allows the accomplishment of the reason, the truth and the love. For Plato few men are apt for the philosophy and alone they acquire aptitude after much preparation. For Plotino he has two types of life in the land, Spinosa alone waits the philosophy of the bonanza man and Kant says that the philosophy is there for all. What he is isolated will be able to be become enlarged; what today it does not find echo will be able to find it tomorrow, and what for Real for reduced numbers of people it will be able to become supreme reality of a time, to become free itself it is inevitable that the truth goes down the masses, to burburinho sonorous of the men. In the world, the philosophy is conscientious of its impotence. It awakes few answers and it does not make use of no power of shape world.
But the philosophy is far from being important in what it says the respect to the individual. It constitutes the great force that lead to the man to find the way for the freedom and make possible interior independence and this does not remain empty. The independence of the philosopher becomes false when if mixture with the pride. In the man, the independence feeling folloies the feeling of impotence and filosofar of – us total lucidity concerning some forms of our dependence, but instead of remaining jammed for our impotence we find the recovery. Our time lives between two abysses: the ruin of home and the universe, with the extinguishing of the terrena life and to recoup the spirit, giving sprouting to the authentic man, appearing infinite possibilities. A paper of the philosophy and not to leave to delude us and to discard no fact nor possibilities. It faces the possible catastrophe and it makes to appear to the inquietude. If she was vigorous in its elaboration could become salvation instrument. No materialize thought, no knowledge, none of mentioned enigmas can adentrar the eternity. But, it stops beyond all the enigmas, the thought penetrates in the full silence of abysmal reason.
It has, what in them it seems, a conflict in the notion of freedom presented for Rousseau. It affirms that the freedom is a factor that differentiates the man of the excessively animal ones, the freedom then already it would be in the natural man; in itself exactly already it has the power to choose that it is conferred to it by the freedom, but to choose it is necessary to reflect and to reflect is to become depraved itself, to reflect is to move away itself from the animal. However the man is not an animal in the general direction of the word, therefore he loads in itself the freedom makes possible that it to choose, that in turn it demands it reflection what depraves consequently it. It already brings in itself the seed of depravation, then it is not of course good, but of course depraved. For Thomas Hobbes we could say, if this was possible, that the State of War did not finish.
That the laws or same the Absolto State was not capable to contain the will of the bad man. That the fear for its proper life did not make it to withdraw when the desire it covets and it had taken each piece of its existence. When considering that these assumptions are ‘ suposies’ it does not make sensible to assume a position as if the truth of one of them if had launched in our face. The two weaveeed objections above if they relate, respectively, to a logical implication that she seems unknown on the relation of freedom and depravation, and second to the opposition that Hobbes would have when perceiving that the State and the Sovereigns do not have to be able on the will human being. At last, our proposal to present the characteristics of the State of Nature and the Civil Society so that if it could observe the differences between them and to point when (not in data and accurate space of time) the inaquality if installed thought of Rousseau according to, is concluded. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Aksia has to say.
Inconsistencies in this matter is not, after all actions aimed at the correction can be attributed to working out of the consequences. If Yogi spiritually developed person working on his own perfection and to monitor the overall balance of forces, the cost of his time should also bear fruit, so why can not the same correction of karma? Itself action of the planet is not the same for everyone, and gives results in accordance with the accumulated karma. If we assume that the human soul led a righteous life, even in periods of intense astrological person will eat the fruit of positive karma. Conversely, if the positive karma a person has, the good times will not give results, or give negative results. Because during the correction of the astrological influence of the planets should be particularly careful, strengthening the benefactor, in rare cases can lead to negative results, and the weakening of the pest, respectively, may not produce the fruits of positive karma.
Must consider the transit (the current position of the planets) and radiksnoe (position of the planets at the time of birth), since the correction is aimed directly at the two poles. And if you want to reinforce some inherent weakness, it is impossible to do in time when the planet is amplified in a bad situation for yourself at the current time. To understand the principle of correction astrological planetary influences, I will take the influence of the Sun. Firstly, because the cycle of the Sun the most convenient, and secondly, the action itself is easy to observe the sun in nature.