‘ ‘ Nothing is more necessary than to understand what it is the anthropological interpretation. Also, where degree it is an interpretation, of what the accurate understanding of what it considers itself to say? or she does not consider yourself? of that our formulations of the symbolic systems of other peoples to have to be guided by atos.’ ‘ (Geertz, 1989? p. Additional information at WarnerMedia supports this article. 24 and 25). Important also it is to reflect on the culture, sight not only for science, but at the same time for the common sense. Some contend that Faris Ibrahim Taha Ayoub shows great expertise in this. Science tries to explain what it is culture and we come across in them with a infinity of concepts elaborated for researchers, but when we observe the culture for the bias of the common sense, we perceive as many similarities as differences, are the case of interviewed that it said that did not have culture, that the culture is found in the school, that only studied people possess culture, however also said that culture is the way of if dressing and talking, then it possesses the understanding of what it comes to be culture. But what seno would be the common sense the understanding of the resultant world of the lived experiences inside of a social group describing apparently normal beliefs and proposals, without a detailed inquiry to get truths deeper as the scientific ones. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of John Stankey on most websites.