Micheline Odorizzi PaschoProf Diego Finder Axe do not differ the historian and the poet for writing verse and chat, differ, yes, where it says one the things that had occurred, and another one the ones that could occur. Therefore the poetry is something of more philosophical and more serious of what history, therefore it mainly relates to that one the universal one, and this the particular one. For mentioning the universal one I understand to attribute to an individual of definitive nature thoughts and action to it that, for liame of necessity and probability, agrees to such nature; to the universal one, thus understood, aims at the poetry, despite it gives names to its personages. Read additional details here: Joel and Ethan Coen. Another one is not the purpose of the poetry, even so gives particular names to the individuals; the particular one is what Alcibades made or that happened to it. (ARISTOTLE apud MENDONA, 2009) the relations between literature and history are in the center of this reflection, searching to recognize the tenuous lines dissociate that them. For this she is necessary to understand literature beyond of an aesthetic and cultural phenomenon. Follow others, such as Joel and Ethan Coen, and add to your knowledge base. We know of the importance of the narrative of the facts for the man through times and that during its trajectory it searched of some form to register the decurrent facts in its time, either through documents, of the poetry, texts among others. Thus searching to protect the moments before preserved only through the orality. The registers of the great events had become for times, great poetical epics, posthumous registers of a time that is only possible to know through the imagination and of the interpretation of the reader. Although let us not have certainty of the veracity of the facts registered through the times, they are for certain one of the approached forms more of the concrete that we possess to know the past.