Not as in a television, where of passive form we observe the light emissions that they emerge of the screen. It would be more as a painting, where the ink never dries. That such enxergar a little more than this screen, in moving away. The risk that we run is to see what it does not please in them or still collating in them with frustration not to obtain to see all the screen due our condition human being. So difficult how much to understand as the other it sights the screen is to obtain to move away itself. Our feet are imprisoned firmly to the soil for the beliefs, the dogmas and the repassed preconceptions generation after generation. The tradition would have to be understood as the inheritance of the memory of our ancestor and not as a barrier for the knowledge. Already Einstein in its Theory of the Relativity said that all substance distorts the space to its redor.
E this distortion is proportional the amount of substance. I believe that the knowledge has similar influence on the o space that we perceive. It reflects a little on who withholds this power currently. Who can mold ' ' realidade' ' following particular interests? How to perceive what it is real and what he is fictitious? Well, it is not easy and we did not wait that it was. All child crosses the phase of the reasons. soon learns that its will not obtain all answers of kissed hand.
Of in such a way asking and observing it starts if to question ahead of the contradictions that verify in the adults. One day this phase passes, and is a penalty. I do not know for which reason we leave to question. We are led to accept the things as they are and still to have that to hear that always they had been thus and never they will leave of being. It is the start of the sad phase of the implied acceptance, the unquestionable truths, today without memory. This phase is now.