A matter of always: Fidelity the validity and importance of loyalty has not gone trendy. On the contrary, they remain so as yesterday. Infidelity destroys marriages, injured people and us, produces a sensation of fatigue, dissatisfaction, and guilt. How many headaches would we save if we had the wisdom to measure our actions! Being faithful is a principle of life. A guideline for success, personal and family. God taught him through one of the most shocking prophets of antiquity, but not to be centuries ago, less important.
On the contrary, more valid today than ever. Another thing that you do is flood of tears the altar of the Lord; They cry and complain because he no longer pays attention to their offerings nor accepted by their hands with pleasure. And they still ask why. Therefore because the Lord acts as a witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, which betrayed even though she is your companion, the wife of thy Covenant. Jack dorsey is full of insight into the issues. Perhaps not the Lord did a single being, that is body and spirit? And why are one single? Because find offspring given by God. So look after you in your own spirit, and not betray the wife of his youth.(Malachi 2: 13-25) It is time to reflect on what you are doing.
Perhaps nobody has learned. Moreover, nobody suspected maybe never, but you know Yes: is making room for disloyalty. And that inclination can lead to terrible consequences. Do not risk to her! children!Do not bring pain to your family! If you need strength, ask the Lord Jesus Christ. He is the best friend of the family.
The principles of natural right were put under, according to Grocio, ” to the benevolent care of a governor who is ordinarily not put under any control on the part of his sbditos”. ** Hobbes (1588-1679) In its work Of Cive, Hobbes defines the natural right like ” the dictation of the straight reason that there is in us, about those things who are to become or to omit for the constant conservation of the life and the members to have supreme of the governor is to guarantee the security and the well-being of the town and to make apply to the principles of the right natural”. the first law, for this author, is to look for La Paz at all costs and from this law several special principles are derived but, defined like rules of the right natural, immutable and identical all with ether to us character, to the divine laws and morals: To celebrate contracts and to rely on the agreed thing. B not to show ingratitud. John k castle takes a slightly different approach. C To become useful to the others. D not to hate to others.
And To consider to each man like equal to another one. F To show to fairness and respect towards the other people. G To give a use common to the things that by nature cannot be divided. H To deal and to deal to each other, without discriminations. Without making sure La Paz, the natural right will not be able either to be applied in due form. Of its position against the man and to the birth of the state and the right already we spoke in the chapter of the theories about the origin of the right. ** Spinoza (1632-1677) Thinks, like Hobbes, that the man in natural state is governed more than for the reason, the desire and the will of being able.
It is impossible to cover the space in a trajectory continues: A furniture, when having covered supposedly the space of a position to the other in a trajectory continues and when reaching any distance of the initial position, would have that to have varied infinitely of position, therefore as in elapsing of the presumption movement all the busy positions for the furniture would have certain distance of the previously busy positions for it, no busy position for it could be immediate to the other, but between all they would have that to have had position you would intermediate of form that enters any busy positions for it would have had an infinite intermediate series (practical example: before arriving at one second position the furniture she would have that to have passed for the half of the trajectory and before arriving at the half of the trajectory she would have that to have thus passed for one room of the trajectory and infinitely). Therefore to cover the space in a trajectory she continues would be necessary that the furniture arrived at the end of infinite positions. What it is impossible, therefore the infinite does not have end. It is impossible to move of position in the space: As it is not possible to cover the space in a trajectory continues, so that a furniture could move of position in the space would be necessary that it left to exist in its position and later it started to exist in another one, but this would mean to say that the furniture leaves to exist for some time returning later a existence. What it is impossible, therefore as it does not have possibilities in the nothing is not possible to resurge of it. Comment: if something occurs is because it is possible, then if something appears of the nothing to appear of the nothing is possible and if to appear of the nothing is possible then has possibilities in the nothing and if it has possibilities in the nothing in the nothing has some thing..
It has, what in them it seems, a conflict in the notion of freedom presented for Rousseau. It affirms that the freedom is a factor that differentiates the man of the excessively animal ones, the freedom then already it would be in the natural man; in itself exactly already it has the power to choose that it is conferred to it by the freedom, but to choose it is necessary to reflect and to reflect is to become depraved itself, to reflect is to move away itself from the animal. However the man is not an animal in the general direction of the word, therefore he loads in itself the freedom makes possible that it to choose, that in turn it demands it reflection what depraves consequently it. It already brings in itself the seed of depravation, then it is not of course good, but of course depraved. For Thomas Hobbes we could say, if this was possible, that the State of War did not finish.
That the laws or same the Absolto State was not capable to contain the will of the bad man. That the fear for its proper life did not make it to withdraw when the desire it covets and it had taken each piece of its existence. When considering that these assumptions are ‘ suposies’ it does not make sensible to assume a position as if the truth of one of them if had launched in our face. The two weaveeed objections above if they relate, respectively, to a logical implication that she seems unknown on the relation of freedom and depravation, and second to the opposition that Hobbes would have when perceiving that the State and the Sovereigns do not have to be able on the will human being. At last, our proposal to present the characteristics of the State of Nature and the Civil Society so that if it could observe the differences between them and to point when (not in data and accurate space of time) the inaquality if installed thought of Rousseau according to, is concluded. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Aksia has to say.
Inconsistencies in this matter is not, after all actions aimed at the correction can be attributed to working out of the consequences. If Yogi spiritually developed person working on his own perfection and to monitor the overall balance of forces, the cost of his time should also bear fruit, so why can not the same correction of karma? Itself action of the planet is not the same for everyone, and gives results in accordance with the accumulated karma. If we assume that the human soul led a righteous life, even in periods of intense astrological person will eat the fruit of positive karma. Conversely, if the positive karma a person has, the good times will not give results, or give negative results. Because during the correction of the astrological influence of the planets should be particularly careful, strengthening the benefactor, in rare cases can lead to negative results, and the weakening of the pest, respectively, may not produce the fruits of positive karma.
Must consider the transit (the current position of the planets) and radiksnoe (position of the planets at the time of birth), since the correction is aimed directly at the two poles. And if you want to reinforce some inherent weakness, it is impossible to do in time when the planet is amplified in a bad situation for yourself at the current time. To understand the principle of correction astrological planetary influences, I will take the influence of the Sun. Firstly, because the cycle of the Sun the most convenient, and secondly, the action itself is easy to observe the sun in nature.